http://trademarkblog.disqus.com/enThu, 04 Jun 2009 15:36:23 -0000http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/06/text-of-complaint-in-la-russa-tm-suit-against-twitter.html#comment-10494640<p>I don't believe Twitter failed to respond. The complaint alleges a lot of things, but failure to respond to a take down request is not one of them. I chalk this up as another lawsuit that does more harm then good. <a href="http://bit.ly/4Yue4" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/4Yue4">http://bit.ly/4Yue4</a></p>GregSJThu, 04 Jun 2009 15:36:23 -0000http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/06/text-of-complaint-in-la-russa-tm-suit-against-twitter.html#comment-10493294<p>From the complaint:</p><p>"Defendant owns the registered domain name twitter,com, and pursuant<br>thereto, <a href="http://twitter.com/TonylaRussa" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitter.com/TonylaRussa">twitter.com/TonylaRussa</a> ('-the Site")... The domain name of this Site, and plaintiffs name used on the Site itself are unauthorized uses of Plaintiff's trademark, his name."</p><p>This seems to show some technical confusion between domain names and other parts of URLs such as file paths.<br></p>dtobiasThu, 04 Jun 2009 15:00:07 -0000