<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Trademark Blog - Latest Comments in My Contribution</title><link>http://trademarkblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://trademarkblog.disqus.com/my_contribution/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:18:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My Contribution</title><link>http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/09/my-contribution.html#comment-2898508</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If it's a government program, its official Web site (if there is one) would logically be in the .gov domain, which isn't easily cybersquattable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dtobias</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:18:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Contribution</title><link>http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/09/my-contribution.html#comment-2624073</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you should suspend all blogging so that you can focus on choosing an appropriate TARP logo. I'm sure other respectable and concerned bloggers will join you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:38:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>