<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Trademark Blog - Latest Comments in INTA Letter To Obama Transition Team</title><link>http://trademarkblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://trademarkblog.disqus.com/inta_letter_to_obama_transition_team/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:26:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: INTA Letter To Obama Transition Team</title><link>http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/01/inta-letter-to-obama-transition-team.html#comment-5109395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think INTA may want to reconsider who created the internet - or is this another "U-571" moment?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:26:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: INTA Letter To Obama Transition Team</title><link>http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/01/inta-letter-to-obama-transition-team.html#comment-5084140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't know the Obama administration was going to take over stewardship of the nation's intellectual property resources1 What does that mean anyway? Will it be hiring a lot of trademark paralegals and docketing clerks? Will it be sending out due-date reminders? I thought the IP owners took care of their own IP resources. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rush Laimbrain</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:30:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>