http://trademarkblog.disqus.com/enSat, 06 Sep 2008 17:52:50 -0000http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/09/google-slaps-findlaw-in-effort-to-crack-down-on-link-juice.html#comment-2188803<p>Here’s my theory. Findlaw was selling links to willing buyers. A Blogger realized this and wrote a story about it thinking he found something. A few other bloggers caught the story. Google in a panic realized that the online community is going to start asking themselves, “Who is Google to tell anyone they cant sell links when they are making billions doing it"? Then Google contacted Findlaw in a frenzy and asked for their cooperation to keep this thing quiet and in the pot. Google wants to maintain the illusion of control. Findlaw helped Google and now Google owes findlaw a favor. Google can kiss my ass...they are pure evil!</p>SteveSat, 06 Sep 2008 17:52:50 -0000http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/09/google-slaps-findlaw-in-effort-to-crack-down-on-link-juice.html#comment-2186655<p>I keep seeing this story spin out of control. FIndlaw did not represent that customers who bought links would "get higher ranking in a search engine called Google". Findlaw sold links, lawyers bought links...these are the only facts. Google has nothing to do with this story.</p>Veronica ShulmanSat, 06 Sep 2008 13:49:16 -0000http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/09/google-slaps-findlaw-in-effort-to-crack-down-on-link-juice.html#comment-2134898<p>Who is google to tell anywebsite they cannot sell links? Google is not god.</p>KathrynThu, 04 Sep 2008 20:26:40 -0000