<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Trademark Blog - Latest Comments in Fun, Simple Way To Police Multiple Brands On Twitter</title><link>http://trademarkblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://trademarkblog.disqus.com/fun_simple_way_to_police_multiple_brands_on_twitter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:44:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Fun, Simple Way To Police Multiple Brands On Twitter</title><link>http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/01/fun-simple-way-to-police-multiple-brands-on-twitter.html#comment-5406876</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A worthy question deserving of an independent blog post but in the meanwhile&lt;br&gt;my quick answer is: yes, if the allocation method is first-come&lt;br&gt;first-served.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">esqmarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:44:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fun, Simple Way To Police Multiple Brands On Twitter</title><link>http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/01/fun-simple-way-to-police-multiple-brands-on-twitter.html#comment-5405133</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is every namespace that becomes popular doomed to become a battleground between expoitative squatters and overreaching corporations?  Are people named "Veronica" doomed not to be able to use their name online anywhere because it'll already be grabbed either by Archie Comics trying to protect their trademark or some squatter trying to infringe it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dtobias</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:38:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>