http://trademarkblog.disqus.com/enMon, 02 Jun 2008 11:11:04 -0000http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/06/ford-claims-trademark-violation-in-artists-images.html#comment-572226<p>This is the prior post regarding Ford, from January:<br><a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/01/boing_boing_car.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/01/boing_boing_car.html">http://www.schwimmerlegal.c...</a></p>esqmartyMon, 02 Jun 2008 11:11:04 -0000http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/06/ford-claims-trademark-violation-in-artists-images.html#comment-572186<p>I remember a story about Ford (on this blog) claiming trademark in photographs in January, though it might have been for a different group. Ford later admitted it's mistake (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/7999)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/7999)">http://creativecommons.org/...</a>. Why is this photographer addressing this issue 6 months later? Is he not aware that Ford realized it made a mistake?</p>T. D. RuthMon, 02 Jun 2008 11:05:44 -0000