<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Trademark Blog - Latest Comments in A Full Trademark Search Would Tend Not To Catch This</title><link>http://trademarkblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://trademarkblog.disqus.com/a_full_trademark_search_would_tend_not_to_catch_this/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:49:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A Full Trademark Search Would Tend Not To Catch This</title><link>http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/06/a-full-trademark-search-would-tend-not-to-catch-this.html#comment-10631876</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But Google sure would've found it.  We tend to forget that just a few years ago we didn't have that amazingly powerful search capability.  If only it permitted Boolean searching!  In any event, I'd prefer if the doll hadn't changed her name from Rubinstein.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jessica</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:49:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>